How SpaceX is so cheap (Bad Audio/script)

03:57 Sep 9, 2020
Today let’s take a look at why landing rockets doesn’t cut costs yet!  Editor: Lightworks  Rocket launch courtesy of NASA Falcon 9 landing courtesy of SpaceX 737 production line courtesy of Boeing F35 production line courtesy of Lockheed Falcon 9 production line courtesy of SpaceX Falcon 9 check courtesy of SpaceX BFR courtesy of SpaceX Raptor engine test courtesy of SpaceX Solar system animation courtesy of Jonaslisting Mars animation courtesy of Mattia  SpaceX makes all their footage/photos available to the public. NASA is a government agency so the footage is in the public domain, aswell this footage was sourced from their free to download video gallery. The animations were sourced from a public domain website Vidvevo The Boeing and Lockheed footage are fair use because this is for educational purposes.  Music was Raw Deal - Gunnar Olsen. There was no direct owner of the music and multiple people had it under the no copyright claim. Music- Cold Funk - Funkorama by Kevin MacLeod is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) Source: http://incompetech.com/music/royalty-free/index.html?isrc=USUAN1100499 Artist: http://incompetech.com/  Inspiration: after watching several live falcon 9 launches I came to wonder if it really was the landing that cut the costs. Along with some research and my own background knowledge, I came to a realization that the driving factors in their dramatic cost difference wasn’t actually landing.  Please email me suggestions or questions! MindLearningPro@gmail.com 

Tags: SpaceX , technology , ULA , BFR , rockets , Falcon9 , Mars , Trip to mars , Production Line , Landing Rockets , Costs

See also:

comments